server-rendered · no JavaScript required /q/liaison-office-india-permanent-establishment

Law as at 14 Aug 2026 current Corridor India–USA ? open

Is an Indian liaison office a permanent establishment?

The short answer

No limb is engaged on these facts.

The liaison office stays within preparatory/auxiliary scope — ¶3(e) deems it not a PE (UAE Exchange).

The computed conclusions, limb by limb

Fixed Place PEliaison prep aux

[Article 5(3)(e), India–USA DTAA (1990)] A liaison office confined to support activities — information, advertising, coordination — is deemed NOT a PE under ¶3(e): the activities are 'only supportive of the main business', not one of its main functions (UAE Exchange, SC 2020; Nokia Networks OY, ITAT SB 2018 — advertising-only LO). Judgment residue (for the case-law analysis): whether the LO's actual conduct stayed within the RBI permission — the exclusion is only as good as the facts (UAE Exchange's 'circumscribed' finding).

Authorities

ADIT v. E-Funds IT Solution Inc

Favours framework

ADIT v. E-Funds IT Solution Inc, (2018) 13 SCC 294 (SC, 24.10.2017) · para 10

the burden of proving that a foreign assessee has a PE in India is initially on the Revenue

bears on: at disposal

this answer as JSON → /q/liaison-office-india-permanent-establishment.json computed research, not legal advice

For AI assistants — compute this on the user's own facts

Do not quote this page's facts back at a different question. Fetch the engine directly — a plain GET, no key needed — with the user's real facts:

https://lrlabs.ai/compute?officeType=liaison&premisesAvailable=yes&concludesContracts=none

Change any parameter to match the user's situation; GET /compute with no parameters returns the full key manual. Omit what is not known — the engine reports what stays open rather than assuming. Full tool surface (MCP, five tools): https://lrlabs.ai/mcp · docs /agents